Appeal No. 96-0362
Application No. 07/909,350
Dwyer does not eliminate transverse curl across the entire
width of the film; according to Dwyer “some transverse curl still
exists.” Column 3, lines 55-59. Dwyer shows the remaining curl
at “F” in Figure 3. We cannot agree that a reference stating
that “some transverse curl still exists” can be said to
“eliminate” transverse curl.
Thus, we do not sustain this rejection.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of Claims 1-3 and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)
as anticipated by Tamamura is not sustained. The rejection of
Claim 1-3, 6, and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) as anticipated by
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007