THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte ROBERT A. CLARK and JOHN PARNALL
________________
Appeal No. 96-0610
Application 08/257,4491
________________
HEARD: July 15, 1997
________________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
MEISTER and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
rejection of claims 1, 2, 4 through 7 and 17 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103. All of the other claims remaining in the application
have been allowed.
1Application for patent filed June 7, 1994. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 08/107,119, filed August 17, 1993, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007