Appeal No. 96-0610
Application 08/257,449
1179, 201 USPQ 67, 70 (CCPA 1979). In any event, the
dependent claims are considered to be unpatentable over the
applied references for the reasons stated by the examiner.
The examiner’s decision rejecting appealed claims 1, 2, 4
through 7 and 17 is therefore affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connec-tion with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
HARRISON E. McCANDLISH )
Senior Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
JAMES M. MEISTER ) BOARD OF
PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
JOHN P. McQUADE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-9-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007