Ex parte CLARK et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 96-0610                                                          
          Application 08/257,449                                                      


          1179, 201 USPQ 67, 70 (CCPA 1979).  In any event, the                       
          dependent claims are considered to be unpatentable over the                 
          applied references for the reasons stated by the examiner.                  
               The examiner’s decision rejecting appealed claims 1, 2, 4              
          through 7 and 17 is therefore affirmed.                                     
               No time period for taking any subsequent action in                     
          connec-tion with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR                   
           1.136(a).                                                                 
                                      AFFIRMED                                        


                      HARRISON E. McCANDLISH              )                           
                      Senior Administrative Patent Judge    )                         
                                                          )                           
                                                          )                           
                                                          )                           
                      JAMES M. MEISTER                    ) BOARD OF                  
          PATENT                                                                      
                      Administrative Patent Judge         )   APPEALS AND             
                                                          )  INTERFERENCES            
                                                          )                           
                                                          )                           
                      JOHN P. McQUADE                     )                           
                      Administrative Patent Judge         )                           








                                         -9-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007