Ex parte DAVID E. WELSH et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 96-0706                                                          
          Application 08/185,756                                                      


               filed is that the aluminum welding material does not                   
               substantially deform the body of the balance weight.                   
               For the reasons set forth above, it is my opinion that                 
               these items are characteristics which are inherent in                  
               the structure which is expressly described in the                      
               specification of the application as originally filed.                  
               I believe that any person having ordinary skill in this                
               art would understand that this structure is present in                 
               the specification of the application as originally                     
               filed, even without any express comments to that                       
               effect.                                                                
               The examiner has maintained the position taken in the                  
          earlier application and remains of the view that claims 23                  
          through 40 are based upon a disclosure which fails to provide               
          descriptive support for the invention now being claimed, as                 
          required by 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, notwithstanding the           
          declarations.  The examiner’s evaluation of these declarations is           
          contained at pages 3 through 8 of the final Office action mailed            
          August 31, 1994.  The examiner has otherwise responded to this              
          evidence primarily by referring to statements in our earlier                
          decision (answer, pp. 3-4).  In sum, the examiner appears to be             
          of the view that (1) the declarations primarily set forth                   
          opinions, entitled to little weight, (2) to the degree that facts           
          are set forth in the declarations, those facts should have been             
          part of the specification of the application as filed, and (3)              
          the facts set forth are insufficient to establish the matters for           
          which they are advanced.                                                    

                                          8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007