Appeal No. 96-0899
Application 07/863,216
comprising rectilinear arrays, we hold that the examiner has not
established a prima facie case of obviousness with regard to the
claimed subject matter of instant claim 10 and we will not
sustain the rejection of claim 10 under 35 U.S.C. 103.
Accordingly, we also will not sustain the rejection of claim 11,
which depends from claim 10, under 35 U.S.C. 103.
CONCLUSION
We have sustained the rejection of claims 5 through 7
under 35 U.S.C. 103 but we have not sustained the rejection of
claims 8 through 11 under 35 U.S.C. 103.
Accordingly, the examiner's decision is affirmed-in-
part.
-11-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007