THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte BRUCE R. BOWMAN and PETER STASZ
__________
Appeal No. 96-0935
Application 08/157,7371
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally
rejecting claims 1 through 20, which constituted all of the
claims of record in the application. Subsequently, however, the
appellants canceled claims 1, 2 and 15 through 20 (Paper No. 17),
and the examiner indicated that claims 3 through 9 were allowed
1Application for patent filed November 24, 1993.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/902,899 filed June 23, 1992, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007