THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte JACK MAZE _____________ Appeal No. 96-0984 Application 08/132,5291 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before CALVERT, COHEN and MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judges. MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Jack Maze (the appellant) appeals from the final rejection of claims 1-10, 12, 14 and 15, the only claims remaining in the application. We reverse.2 1Application for patent filed October 6, 1993. 2Claim 2 was amended, and claims 11 and 13 canceled, by an amendment filed subsequent to final rejection on February 21, 1995 (Paper No. 6). 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007