THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JACK MAZE
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0984
Application 08/132,5291
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, COHEN and MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Jack Maze (the appellant) appeals from the final rejection
of claims 1-10, 12, 14 and 15, the only claims remaining in the
application. We reverse.2
1Application for patent filed October 6, 1993.
2Claim 2 was amended, and claims 11 and 13 canceled, by an
amendment filed subsequent to final rejection on February 21,
1995 (Paper No. 6).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007