Ex parte MAZE et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 96-0984                                                          
          Application 08/132,529                                                      


          1461, 1464 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. 1990)).  It simply does not                
          follow that just because the texture of a surface is rough that             
          it has interconnected depressions with communicating passageways.           
          For example, a rough surface can be formed by spaced apart                  
          depressions having no interconnecting passageways whatsoever.               
          While of course it is possible that some roughened surfaces may             
          have interconnected depressions with communicating passageways,             
          inherency may not be established by probabilities or                        
          possibilities.  See In re Oelrich, 666 F.2d 578, 581, 212 USPQ              
          323, 326 (CCPA 1981) and Rijckaert, 9 F.3d at 1534, 28 USPQ2d at            
          1957.                                                                       
               Since (1) there is no reasonable basis to conclude that the            
          roughened surface of Bridger inherently has interconnected                  
          depressions with communicating passageways and (2) the examiner             
          has not provided a factual basis for establishing the obviousness           
          of such an arrangement (see In re GPAC Inc, 57 F.3d 1573, 1582,             
          35 USPQ2d 1116, 1123 (Fed. Cir. 1995) and In re Warner, 379 F.2d            









                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007