Ex parte MIMEUR et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                              Paper No. 15            
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     __________                                       
                               Ex parte NICOLAS MIMEUR                                
                                AND JEAN-MARC GUIBAUD                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                 Appeal No. 96-0987                                   
                               Application 08/226,4671                                
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       

          Before McCandlish, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and                  
          LYDDANE and MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judges.                          
          LYDDANE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                    This is a decision on an appeal from the final                    
          rejection of claims 8 through 14, which are all of the claims               
          remaining in the application.                                               
                    The subject matter on appeal is directed to an iron-              
          type golf club head.  Claim 8 is exemplary of the invention and             
          reads as follows:                                                           


             Application for patent filed April 12, 1994.1                                                                      
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007