Appeal No. 96-1032 Application 08/197,443 Rejection (2) Claim 19 adds to parent claim 25 the recitation that the indicia applying means is a rubber stamp having the indicia embossed thereon. Rejection (2) will not be sustained for the2 same reasons as rejection (1), since the additional reference, Phipps, does not supply the deficiencies noted with regard to the combination of Gunn and Pusic. Conclusion The examiner’s decision to reject claims 2 to 6, 8, 19 to 21, 23 and 25 is reversed. REVERSED IAN A. CALVERT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) JAMES E. MEISTER ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) NEAL E. ABRAMS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 2We note that this recited feature is not shown in the drawings, as required by 37 CFR § 1.83(a). -5-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007