Appeal No. 96-1511 Application 08/063,919 underside thereof, for attaching the tube holder to the surface of the can 5. . . . A pair of spaced apart, upstanding tube grasping members 18 and 19, are integrally connected to the top surface of the base 14. As best seen in FIG. 3, a spacing 15 between the members 18 and 19 is suitably dimensioned to receive the rodlike tube 12 therewithin. The spacing 15 has at the top edges of the members 18 and 19, a width H which is just slightly less than the outside diameter of the tube 12. As shown in FIG. 3, the members 18 and 19 are inclined slightly toward one another, and are composed of resilient material [column 4, line 45 through column 5, line 3]. As best illustrated in Figure 2, the base 14 has a rectangular shape defined by a pair of relatively long opposite lateral edges and relatively short opposite end edges. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the holder device disclosed by Copell by providing it with a rectangular base portion having opposite lateral edges and adhesive on its bottom surface as taught by Engvall in order to adapt the device for adhesive connection to an underlying support surface. The resulting holder device would meet all of the limitations in claims 1, 2, 7 and 9. It also would have been an obvious matter of design choice within the skill of the art to make Copell’s semi-circular recesses 13 triangular in cross-section as recited in claim 8. The triangular recess cross-section has not been disclosed or 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007