Ex parte HOYT - Page 1






                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                 
                         today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                   
                         journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               
                                                                                                         Paper No. 11                         
                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                                     Ex parte EARL E. HOYT                                                                    
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                                        Appeal No. 96-1596                                                                    
                                                Application No. 08/106,4891                                                                   
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                Before CALVERT, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                            



                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                               
                rejection of claims 1, 2, 4 through 11 and 13 through 17, which                                                               
                are all of the claims pending in this application.                                                                            

                         We AFFIRM-IN-PART.                                                                                                   



                         1Application for patent filed August 13, 1993.                                                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007