Appeal No. 96-1596
Application No. 08/106,489
17 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) since each and every element set
forth in these claims is not found in Stull.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims
1, 2, 4, 5, 7 and 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is affirmed and the
decision of the examiner to reject claims 6, 9 through 11 and 13
through 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed.
No period for taking any subsequent action in connection
with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
IAN A. CALVERT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JEFFREY V. NASE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007