Appeal No. 96-1741
Application 08/160,111
In summary, the provisional rejection of claims 1-25,
27-64 and 66-93 on the ground of obviousness-type double
patenting is sustained. The rejection of claims 1, 7-11, 14-
25, 32, 34-40, 46-50, 53-64, 71 and 73-93 under 35 U.S.C. §
103 is sustained with respect to claims 1, 7-11, 37, 40, 46-
50, 76 and 79-93 but is reversed with respect to claims 14-25,
32, 34-36, 38, 39, 53-64, 71 and 73-75, 77 and 78.
Accordingly, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-
25, 27-64 and 66-93 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
)
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
16
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007