THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MICHEL FALLAH
_____________
Appeal No. 96-1774
Application 07/822,2071
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KRASS, TORCZON, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of Claims 9, 10,
15, and 16. The other claims remaining in the application,
Claims 11-14, have been objected to as being dependent upon a
rejected base claim, but allowable if rewritten in independent
form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any
intervening claims. We reverse.
1Application for patent filed January 17, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007