Paper No. 46
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte HEINZ K. MACHO
AND KLAUS D. HUNGENBERG
______________
Appeal No. 96-1879
Application 08/006,1941
_______________
HEARD: AUGUST 5, 1997
_______________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
LYDDANE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LYDDANE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's refusal
to allow claims 20 through 26 and 28 through 43, which are all
of the claims pending in the application.
Application for patent filed January 19, 1993. According to1
applicants, this application is a continuation-in-part of Application
07/205,319, filed June 10, 1988, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007