Ex parte FITZPATRICK et al. - Page 1

                                 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                 
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)                                                                
                was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not                                                               
                binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                               
                                                                                   Paper No. 15                                               

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 

                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                         Ex parte GREGORY P. FITZPATRICK and MARVIN L. WILLIAMS                                                               
                                                        Appeal No. 96-2097                                                                    
                                                    Application 08/037,9831                                                                   
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      

                Before URYNOWICZ, MARTIN and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                               
                URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                       

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-18, all                                                          
                the claims pending in the application.                                                                                        
                         The invention pertains to scheduling a meeting between two                                                           
                entities (a "requester" and a "target") when a conflicting event                                                              

                         Application for patent filed March 25, 1993.1                                                                                                                   

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007