Ex parte FITZPATRICK et al. - Page 1




                                 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                 
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)                                                                
                was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not                                                               
                binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                               
                                                                                   Paper No. 15                                               

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                                              __________                                                                      

                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                              __________                                                                      
                         Ex parte GREGORY P. FITZPATRICK and MARVIN L. WILLIAMS                                                               
                                                              __________                                                                      
                                                        Appeal No. 96-2097                                                                    
                                                    Application 08/037,9831                                                                   
                                                             ___________                                                                      
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      
                                                             ___________                                                                      

                Before URYNOWICZ, MARTIN and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                               
                URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                       

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-18, all                                                          
                the claims pending in the application.                                                                                        
                         The invention pertains to scheduling a meeting between two                                                           
                entities (a "requester" and a "target") when a conflicting event                                                              



                         Application for patent filed March 25, 1993.1                                                                                                                   
                                                                      1                                                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007