Ex parte FITZPATRICK et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-2097                                                          
          Application 08/037,983                                                      


          appears on an electronic calendar of the target at the requested            
          meeting time.  Claim 1 is illustrative and reads as follows:                


               1.  A method, performed in a data processing system, for               
          scheduling a meeting between a requester and a target on an                 
          electronic calendar maintained on the data processing system by             
          the target, wherein said requester and said target are separate             
          entities, the method comprising the computer implemented steps              
          of:                                                                         
               determining, in response to an input, to the data processing           
          system, of a date, a time and a duration of a proposed meeting              
          between the requester and the target, that a conflicting event              
          appears on the electronic calendar maintained on the data                   
          processing system by the target for the date and time and during            
          the duration input to the data processing system;                           
               in response to a selection, by the requester, upon the                 
          determination that a conflicting event appears on the electronic            
          calendar maintained by the target, to monitor the electronic                
          calendar maintained by the target for the removal of the                    
          conflicting event, and also in response to the determination that           
          the conflicting event appears on the electronic calendar                    
          maintained by the target, monitoring the electronic calendar                
          maintained by the target to detect the removal of the conflicting           
          event from the electronic calendar maintained by the target; and            
               scheduling a meeting between the requester and the target on           
          the electronic calendar maintained by the target, in response to            
          the detection of the removal of the conflicting event from the              
          electronic calendar maintained by the target.                               
               The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of              
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Hotaling et al. (Hotaling)          5,124,912      Jun. 23, 1992            
          McGaughey, III et al. (McGaughey)   4,977,520      Dec. 11, 1990            



                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007