Ex parte PAPPALARDO - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
                                   _______________                                    
                                                            Paper No. 14              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                                                                     

                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                                                                     

                            Ex parte ROMANO G. PAPPALARDO                             
                                                                                     
                                 Appeal No. 96-2138                                   
                               Application 07/967,6071                                
                                                                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                                                                     
          Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.          
          BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the            
          final rejection of claims 1-20, all of the claims pending in the            
          application.  We reverse.                                                   


            Application for patent filed October 28, 1992, entitled1                                                                      
          "Fluorescent Lamp With Improved CRI And Brightness."                        
                                        - 1 -                                         





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007