Ex parte PAPPALARDO - Page 1

                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
                                                            Paper No. 14              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       

                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    

                            Ex parte ROMANO G. PAPPALARDO                             
                                 Appeal No. 96-2138                                   
                               Application 07/967,6071                                
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
          Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.          
          BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the            
          final rejection of claims 1-20, all of the claims pending in the            
          application.  We reverse.                                                   

            Application for patent filed October 28, 1992, entitled1                                                                      
          "Fluorescent Lamp With Improved CRI And Brightness."                        
                                        - 1 -                                         

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007