THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. _______________ Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte ROMANO G. PAPPALARDO Appeal No. 96-2138 Application 07/967,6071 ON BRIEF Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1-20, all of the claims pending in the application. We reverse. Application for patent filed October 28, 1992, entitled1 "Fluorescent Lamp With Improved CRI And Brightness." - 1 -Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007