THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES L. NOVAK
____________
Appeal No. 96-2194
Application 08/042,2921
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, MARTIN, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision in an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 6-9, 13-15 and
17-19 over prior art. Claims 2-5 and 16 stand objected to for
Application for patent filed April 2, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007