THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MARTIN A. KATZ
__________
Appeal No. 96-2366
Application 08/076,8241
__________
REMAND TO THE EXAMINER
__________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and WILLIAM F. SMITH and GRON,
Administrative Patent Judges.
1Application for patent filed June 14, 1993. According to appellant, the
application is a continuation of Application 07/803,234, filed December 5, 1991, now
abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/644,869, filed January 23,
1991, now Patent No. 5,145,675; which is a continuation of Application 07/334,051, filed
April 5, 1989; which is a division of Application 07/091,641, filed August 31, 1987, now
abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of Application 06/810,478, filed December 18,
1985, now abandoned; a continuation-in-part of Application 06/846,321, filed March 31,
1986, now abandoned; a continuation-in-part of Application 06/896,956, filed August 15,
1986, now abandoned; a continuation-in-part of Application 06/925,081, filed October 30,
1986, now abandoned; a continuation-in-part of Application 06/925,082, filed October 30,
1986, now abandoned; a continuation-in-part of Application 06/932,613, filed November
20, 1986, now abandoned; a continuation-in-part of Application 06/933,243, filed
November 21, 1986, now abandoned; a continuation-in-part of Application 06/936,520,
filed December 1, 1986, now abandoned; and a continuation-in-part of Application
06/940,754, filed December 10, 1986, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007