Appeal No. 96-2366 Application 08/076,824 which indicated that the now filed application is a continuation, not a continuation-in-part of Application 07/803,234. The request under 37 CFR § 1.62 was accompanied by a Preliminary Amendment containing, inter alia, an amendment to the specification. The Preliminary Amendment also confirmed counsel’s apparent intent to file this application as a “FWC-I-P” application. For present purposes, we will assume this application was intended to be a continuation-in-part of Application 07/803,234, not a continuation as counsel indicated in the request. Under those circumstances, the request for filing the application under 37 CFR § 1.62 should have been accompanied by a new oath or declaration. It was not. Thus, this application, to be considered proper, must be assumed to have been filed under the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.62(d). According to that rule, the Patent and Trademark Office should have notified counsel that an oath or declaration by the applicant was needed and provided a period of time for the purposes of filing the oath or declaration and to pay the required surcharge. It does not appear from this record that the Patent and Trademark Office so notified counsel. However, the needed declaration was filed by counsel on December 14, 1994, but it does not appear that it was accompanied by the required surcharge. 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007