THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOHN W. PODUSKA, JR.
_____________
Appeal No. 96-2379
Application 07/837,2401
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, BARRETT and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 1-20. No claim has been
allowed. We affirm the rejection of claims 1-9 and 12-19 and
reverse the rejection of claims 10, 11 and 20.
References relied on by the Examiner
Mori et al. (Mori) 5,294,984 Mar. 15, 1994
(filed Jan. 13, 1992)
1 Application for patent filed February 14, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007