THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RICHARD J. KAMPS, JANICA S. BEHNKE, FUNG-JOU CHEN,
BERNHARDT E. KRESSNER and JANICE G. NIELSEN
____________
Appeal No. 96-2630
Application 08/259,8241
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 23 through
30. Claims 32 through 48, the only other claims pending in the
application, stand allowed.
The subject matter on appeal pertains to a tissue sheet.
Claims 23 and 26 are representative and read as follows:
1Application for patent filed June 15, 1994. According to
the appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
08/046,789, filed April 12, 1993, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007