THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte KOLAZI S. NARAYANAN
________________
Appeal No. 96-2665
Application 07/975,8111
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 10, 15,
17, 18, 20-26, 28-40 and 45-51, all the claims remaining in the
present application. A copy of illustrative claim 45 is2
appended to this decision.
The examiner has not applied prior art in the rejection of
the appealed claims.
1Application for patent filed November 13, 1992.
2Claim 27 was cancelled by appellant in Amendment B, filed
March 14, 1994 (Paper No. 7).
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007