Paper No. 33
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte CHRISTOPHER H. STROLLE
AND RAYMOND A. SCHNITZLER
______________
Appeal No. 96-2748
Application 08/008,8131
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HARKCOM, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and
THOMAS and KRASS, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1 to 3, 5 to 8, 10 to 14, 16, and
Application for patent filed January 25, 1993. According to1
applicants, this application is a continuation-in-part of Application
07/604,494, filed October 26, 1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007