Appeal No. 96-2748
Application 08/008,813
well as from the reasoning advanced by the examiner. Since we
have not sustained the rejection of each independent claim on
appeal, the rejection of their respective dependent claims falls
as well. Accordingly, the decision of the examiner rejecting all
claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
GARY V. HARKCOM, Vice Chief )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
JAMES D. THOMAS ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007