THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte GASTONE FIORI
__________
Appeal No. 96-2890
Application 08/318,7811
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before MEISTER, ABRAMS and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally
rejecting claims 11 and 22, which constitute all of the claims of
record in the application, the other claims having been canceled.
1Application for patent filed October 17, 1994. According
to appellant, this application is a 371 continuation of
International Application No. PCT/IT93/00076 filed July 20, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007