Ex parte KEITH F. WOODRUFF et al. - Page 1

                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                 
                         today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                   
                         journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               
                                                                                                        Paper No. 19                          

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                              Ex parte KEITH F. WOODRUFF and DONALD E. BRADLEY                                                                
                                                        Appeal No. 96-3002                                                                    
                                                    Application 08/164,2951                                                                   
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      
                Before CALVERT, ABRAMS and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                               
                CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                         

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 and                                                           
                15.  Claims 2 to 6, 8 to 11, 13, 14, 16 to 19 and 21, the other                                                               
                claims in the application, have been allowed.                                                                                 
                         Claim 15 is representative of the subject matter involved:                                                           
                         Claim 15.  A container for liquid and semi-liquid product,                                                           
                said container comprising:                                                                                                    
                         a first inner tank for holding said product,                                                                         

                         1Application for patent filed December 9, 1993.                                                                      

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007