Ex parte KEITH F. WOODRUFF et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 96-3002                                                          
          Application 08/164,295                                                      


          container of Coleman with legs and upwardly extending                       
          projections, in order to allow it to be stacked.  Such                      
          modification of the Coleman container would not involve                     
          impermissible hindsight or “using Applicant’s own disclosure as a           
          guide for combining the references” (reply brief, page 4), but              
          rather would be readily suggested by Ata’s disclosure (supra) of            
          the advantages to be gained by stacking containers.                         
               Accordingly, the rejection of claims 1 and 15 will be                  
          sustained.                                                                  























                                         -4-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007