THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RODNEY P. EHRLICH
____________
Appeal No. 96-3263
Application No. 08/363,5941
____________
HEARD: April 11, 1997
____________
Before COHEN, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 8, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
We REVERSE.
1Application for patent filed December 23, 1994. According
to the appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/063,023, filed May 17, 1993, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007