Ex parte GUTTAG et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-3494                                                          
          Application 08/160,299                                                      


          corresponding to said function signal, said mixed arithmetic                
          and Boolean combination including at least an arithmetic                    
          combination of only said first and second inputs and an                     
          arithmetic combination of only said first and third inputs;                 
               a first data source supplying a first multibit digital                 
          signal to said first data input of said arithmetic logic unit;              
               a second data source supplying a second multibit                       
          digital signal;                                                             


               a barrel rotator having a data input connected to said                 
          second data source, a rotate control input receiving a rotate               
          control signal, and a data output connected to said second                  
          data input of the arithmetic logic unit, said barrel rotator                
          left rotating said second multibit digital signal an amount                 
          corresponding to said rotate control signal and supplying said              
          left rotated second multibit digital signal to said second                  
          data input of said arithmetic logic unit; and                               
               a third data source supplying a third multibit digital                 
          signal to said third data input of said arithmetic logic unit.              
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Chu et al. (Chu)                    4,785,393    Nov. 15, 1988              
          Pfeiffer et al. (Pfeiffer)          5,146,592    Sep. 08, 1992              
          Vassiliadis et al. (Vassiliadis)    5,299,319    Mar. 29, 1994              
          (filed Mar. 29,                                                             
          1991)                                                                       
          Claims 1-33 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                           
          second paragraph, as failing to particularly point out and                  
          distinctly claim the invention.  Claims 1-33 also stand                     
          provisionally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as claiming the                

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007