Paper No. 22
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte PAMELA H. MARTIN,
WILLIAM J. KAUFFMAN AND
BRUCE F. DIETRICH
______________
Appeal No. 96-3723
Application 08/136,939 1
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before RONALD H. SMITH, HANLON and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RONALD H. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge .
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
1-12, 21 and 22, all the pending claims in the application.
Application for patent filed October 18, 1993. According to1
appellants, this application is a continuation of Application 07/500,552,
filed March 28, 1990, now Patent No. 5,256,465, issued October 26, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007