THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte HARRY F. SMITH
and MARK F. HARRINGTON
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3758
Application 08/252,8321
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before BARRETT, FLEMING and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 1-4, 7-12, 16-19 and 21-22.
Claims 5, 6, 13, 14, 15 and 20 have been indicated as containing
allowable subject matter (Paper No. 11 at 6).
1 Application for patent filed June 2, 1994. According to applicants, the
application is a continuation-in-part of Application 08/066,967, filed May 25,
1993, now Patent No. 5,327,066, granted July 5, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007