THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ROBERT J. MILETI
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3885
Application 08/255,0761
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before COHEN, STAAB, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 3, 7 through 10, 13 through 17, and 19. The examiner has
indicated that claim 18, the only other claim remaining in the
application, is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected
1Application for Patent filed June 7, 1994, which is a
continuation-in-part of application 08/018,839, filed February
18, 1993, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007