Ex parte MILETI - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-3885                                                          
          Application No. 08/255,076                                                  


               The following rejections are before us for review.                     


               Claims 1 through 3, 6, 7, and 19 stand rejected under 35               
          U.S.C.  103 as being unpatentable over Hill in view of Waters,             
          and vice versa.                                                             


               Claims 1 through 3, 6, 7, and 19  stand rejected under 35              
          U.S.C.  103 as being unpatentable over Hill in view of Waters,             
          and vice versa, as applied above, further in view of Stauffer.              


               Claims 8 through 10 and 13 through 17 stand rejected under             
          35 U.S.C.  103 as being unpatentable over Hill in view of                  
          Waters, and vice versa, as earlier applied, further in view of              
          Klahn.                                                                      


               Claims 8 through 10 and 13 through 17 stand rejected under             
          35 U.S.C.  103 as being unpatentable over Hill in view of                  
          Waters, and vice versa, as earlier applied, further in view of              
          Stauffer and Klahn .                                                        


               The full text of the examiner's rejections and response to             
          the argument presented by appellant appears in the answer (Paper            

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007