Appeal No. 96-3885
Application No. 08/255,076
The following rejections are before us for review.
Claims 1 through 3, 6, 7, and 19 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hill in view of Waters,
and vice versa.
Claims 1 through 3, 6, 7, and 19 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hill in view of Waters,
and vice versa, as applied above, further in view of Stauffer.
Claims 8 through 10 and 13 through 17 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hill in view of
Waters, and vice versa, as earlier applied, further in view of
Klahn.
Claims 8 through 10 and 13 through 17 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hill in view of
Waters, and vice versa, as earlier applied, further in view of
Stauffer and Klahn .
The full text of the examiner's rejections and response to
the argument presented by appellant appears in the answer (Paper
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007