Appeal No. 96-4085
Application 08/341,837
We have additionally reviewed the teachings of Pruden
and Hull applied by the examiner against dependent claims 13, 19
and 20. However, we find nothing in these references which would
supply that which we have found lacking in the basic combination
of Johnson and Ciolino. Accordingly, the rejections of claims
13, 19 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 will also not be sustained.
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 2, 4,
8 through 13, 19 through 23 and 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is
reversed.
REVERSED
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007