Ex parte LONGCOR et al. - Page 34




                    Appeal No. 97-0032                                                                                                                                     
                    Application No. 08/095,295                                                                                                                             


                    an expanded state where the outer wall is relatively far from the                                                                                      
                    inner wall.13                                                                                                                                          


                              Contrary to my colleague's positions, I believe that the                                                                                     
                    only difference between Warren and the subject matter recited in                                                                                       
                    claim 33 is the recitation that the compartment is a bellows                                                                                           
                    compartment wherein the pair of opposite sides has a plurality of                                                                                      
                    expandable pleats so that the compartment can be compressed to a                                                                                       
                    collapsed state where the outer wall is relatively close to the                                                                                        
                    inner wall or extended to an expanded state where the outer wall                                                                                       
                    is relatively far from the inner wall.  It is my opinion that it                                                                                       
                    would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at                                                                                         
                    the time of appellants' invention to modify Warren's purse to                                                                                          
                    include pleated sides as suggested by Worrall's purse.                                                                                                 


                              With respect to claim 33 appellants argue that none of the                                                                                   
                    references show or remotely suggest the pivot means which enables                                                                                      
                    the container to be pivoted to a usable horizontal position no                                                                                         
                    matter what the angle of the supporting belt on the user's body                                                                                        
                    (brief, pp. 15 and 17).   Specifically, appellants point out that                                                                                      



                              13See Figures 1 and 2 of Worrall.                                                                                                            
                                                                                   3434                                                                                    





Page:  Previous  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007