THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 57
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JAMES R. LUND
__________
Appeal No. 97/0338
Application 08/229,3981
__________
HEARD: October 15, 1997
__________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, CALVERT and
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 52 to
57, all the claims remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed April 18, 1994. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation of Application
07/982,249 filed November 25, 1992, now abandoned, which is a
continuation of Application 07/777,758 filed October 15, 1991,
now abandoned, which is a division of Application 07/556,491
filed July 26, 1990, now U.S. Patent No. 5,112,095 issued May 12,
1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007