THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN H. MALIK, JOHN J. MIKULA and ROBERT A. JULIEN
____________
Appeal No. 97-0677
Application No. 08/312,7101
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge and
McQUADE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 4, which are all of the claims
pending in this application. In the examiner's answer, the
examiner allowed claim 4 and objected to claim 3 as depending
from a rejected claim. Accordingly, claims 1 and 2 remain on
appeal.
Application for patent filed September 27, 1994.1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007