THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 41
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte JEAN-PIERRE GLOTON
and PHILLIPE PERES
______________
Appeal No. 97-0819
Application 08/252,0631
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, WARREN and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision
of the examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 28. Claims
1 through 9 were subsequently allowed by the examiner, leaving
claims 10 through 28 for our consideration on appeal. Claims
10 and 21 are illustrative of the claims on appeal:
10. An electronic component support for a memory card
which has a cavity to house said component, said support
1 Application for patent filed June 1, 1994. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation of application
07/919,047, filed July 23, 1992, which is a reissue of U.S.
Patent No. 4,943,464, maturing from application 07/278,979,
filed December 1, 1988.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007