Paper No. 19
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte KLAUS SCHMIDT
______________
Appeal No. 97-0894
Application 08/069,931 1
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, FLEMING and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges .
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge .
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 7 and 10, after having
canceled claim 2. The examiner has objected to claims 5, 6, 8
and 9, but page 2 of the final rejection indicates that they
would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all
the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.
Application for patent filed May 28, 1993.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007