Appeal No. 97-0894
Application 08/069,931
As to those arguments raised but not specifically addressed
earlier in this opinion, we note that Mueller’s coil bobbin 29 in
Figure 5 is of one-piece construction even though it contains
within it the magnetic band 33 as a molded part. To follow
appellant’s reasoning, the magnetizable particles within his own
disclosed and claimed invention would not have made the coil
body/bobbin one-piece.
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the examiner
rejecting claims 1, 3, 4, 7 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is
affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007