THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 44
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NIKOLAY PARADA
____________
Appeal No. 97-1025
Application No. 08/183,5711
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, LYDDANE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 to 8, 10 to 15, 20 to 33, 35, 37, 38 and 40
to 44, which are all of the claims pending in this application.2
We AFFIRM-IN-PART and enter new rejections pursuant to
1Application for patent filed January 19, 1994. According
to the appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/912,815, filed July 13, 1992, now abandoned.
2Claims 3, 8 and 21 have been amended subsequent to the
final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007