Ex parte PARADA - Page 4




          Appeal No. 97-1025                                                          
          Application No. 08/183,571                                                  


               Claims 1 to 8, 10 to 15, 20 to 33, 35, 37, 38 and 40 to 44             
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.  112, second paragraph, as being            
          indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly             
          claim the subject matter which the appellant regards as the                 
          invention.                                                                  


               Claims 1 to 3, 6, 8, 10 to 15, 20, 38 and 40 to 44 stand               
          rejected under 35 U.S.C.  102(b) as being anticipated by, or in            
          the alternative, under 35 U.S.C.  103 as being unpatentable over           
          Kato.                                                                       


               Claims 1 to 8, 10 to 12, 20, 21, 23, 25 to 33, 35, 37, 38,             
          43 and 44 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.  102(b) as being                  
          anticipated by, or in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C.  103 as             
          being unpatentable over Niemeyer.                                           


               Claims 1, 2, 5 to 7, 20 to 33, 37 and 38 stand rejected                
          under 35 U.S.C.  102(b) as being anticipated by, or in the                 
          alternative, under 35 U.S.C.  103 as being unpatentable over               
          Rose.                                                                       




                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007