Ex parte PARADA - Page 4




          Appeal No. 97-1025                                                          
          Application No. 08/183,571                                                  


               Claims 1 to 8, 10 to 15, 20 to 33, 35, 37, 38 and 40 to 44             
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being            
          indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly             
          claim the subject matter which the appellant regards as the                 
          invention.                                                                  


               Claims 1 to 3, 6, 8, 10 to 15, 20, 38 and 40 to 44 stand               
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by, or in            
          the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over           
          Kato.                                                                       


               Claims 1 to 8, 10 to 12, 20, 21, 23, 25 to 33, 35, 37, 38,             
          43 and 44 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                  
          anticipated by, or in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as             
          being unpatentable over Niemeyer.                                           


               Claims 1, 2, 5 to 7, 20 to 33, 37 and 38 stand rejected                
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by, or in the                 
          alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over               
          Rose.                                                                       




                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007