Ex parte SIMMONS - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-1384                                                          
          Application 08/068,357                                                      

                    logic means for receiving the control signals,                    
          performing the desired function, and producing a reply signal               
          that indicates the serial number of the receiving RF modem to               
          establish point-to-point communication between the transmitting             
          and receiving RF modem pair.                                                



                    The examiner relies on the following references:                  
          Kirchner et al. (Kirchner)    4,665,519           May  12, 1987             
          Rubin                         4,788,543           Nov. 29, 1988             
          Nelson et al. (Nelson)        4,852,122           Jul. 25, 1989             
          La Mura et al. (La Mura)      5,157,222           Oct. 20, 1992             
          Caswell et al. (Caswell)      5,231,273           Jul. 27, 1993             
                                                  (filed Apr. 9, 1991)                

                    Claims 1, 3, 7 through 9, 11 through 13 and 15 stand              
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the              
          examiner cites Nelson in view of Caswell and Rubin with regard to           
          independent claims 1 and 9, adding La Mura to this combination              
          with regard to claims 3, 13 and 15 and adding Kirchner to the               
          original combination with regard to claims 7, 8, 11 and 12.                 
                    Rather than reiterate the arguments of appellant and              
          the examiner, reference is made to the briefs and answers for the           
          respective details thereof.                                                 
                                       OPINION                                        
                    At the outset, we note that, in accordance with                   
          appellant's grouping of claims at page 3 of the principal brief,            
          claims 3, 7, 8 and 13 will stand with independent claim 1 and               

                                         -3-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007