Ex parte PARKER et al. - Page 1

                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                                                    
                (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                                                      
                (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                    

                                                                                                    Paper No. 21                              

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                 Ex parte JAMES R. PARKER, WILLIAM J. MURPHY,                                                                 
                                  CHARLES L. THOMECZEK JR., DANIEL L. KENNEDY,                                                                
                                          GARY T. NEEL and DAVID E. STORVICK                                                                  
                                                        Appeal No. 97-2142                                                                    
                                                    Application 08/114,8961                                                                   
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      

                Before CALVERT, MEISTER and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent                                                                   
                MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                         

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-7,                                                            
                the only claims present in the application.  We reverse.                                                                      
                         The appellants’ invention pertains to a blood coagulation                                                            

                         1Application for patent filed August 31, 1993.                                                                       

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007