Appeal No. 97-2142 Application 08/114,896 iner’s view that Oberhardt shows an instrument for determining a blood characteristic where a magnetic substance is mixed with the blood and a magnet causes the magnetic particles to orient in a manner dependent on the characteristic of the blood. No structure of the magnet is recited, but in column 4, lines 29 and 30, Oberhardt discloses that a combination of a permanent and oscillating magnetic field may be used. Therefore, any magnet producing a permanent and oscillating field would appear to [be] acceptable for the system of Oberhardt. Ootsuka teaches a magnet that produces a permanent static and oscillating magnetic field having a core having a first leg 4, a coil 6, and a return 1 and 5. From this teaching, it would have been obvious to modify Oberhardt to use the magnet structure of Ootsuka, as it is merely the substitution of one known equivalent magnet for another. [Answer, page 3.] We will not support the examiner’s position. Initially we note that the examiner appears to believe that Oberhardt does not teach any specific magnetic structure. This is not the case. Oberhardt in Fig. 5 clearly teaches an electromagnet 196 that extends perpendicularly to a permanent magnet 195. The examiner has seized upon the fact that Oberhardt in the “SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION” makes no mention of any specific structure when generally describing the type of magnets being utilized in lines 29 and 30 of column 4. However, just because Oberhardt fails to specifically mention the structural details of the particular magnets being employed in the broad summary of the invention, does not serve as a sufficient factual basis for 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007