GALIMBERTI et al. V. ASANUMA et al. - Page 5




                 Interference No. 103,303                                                                                                               


                          The party Galimberti et al.'s claim 1 and the party                                                                           
                 Asanuma et al.'s claims 9 and 11 correspond to count 1.  The                                                                           
                 party Galimberti et al.'s claim 2 and the party Asanuma et                                                                             
                 al.'s claims 16 correspond to count 2.                                                                                                 
                          The junior party Galimberti et al. relies under 35 U.S.C.                                                                     
                 § 119 upon the priority date of its application filed in                                                                               
                 Italy.  Since that date is subsequent to the effective filing                                                                          
                 date of the senior party Asanuma et al., judgment pursuant to                                                                          
                 37 CFR § 1.640(d)(3) would normally be issued against the                                                                              
                 party Galimberti et al.  The party Galimberti et al. filed a                                                                           
                 motion on the ground that an interference-in-fact does not                                                                             
                 exist and consideration of the motion was deferred to final                                                                            
                 hearing.  Both parties took testimony,  filed briefs, and           3                                                                  
                 appeared, through counsel, at final hearing.  In addition, the                                                                         
                 parties filed three motions to suppress evidence and                                                                                   
                 testimony.                                                                                                                             
                          Subsequent to the final hearing, the party Galimberti et                                                                      
                 al. filed a submission (Paper No. 91), which is objected to by                                                                         


                          3The Galimberti et al. record and exhibits will be                                                                            
                 referred to, respectively, as GR followed by its page number                                                                           
                 and GX followed by its number.  The Asanuma et al. record and                                                                          
                 exhibits will be referred to, respectively, as AR followed by                                                                          
                 its page number and AX followed by its number.                                                                                         
                                                                         -5-                                                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007