GALIMBERTI et al. V. ASANUMA et al. - Page 24




            Interference No. 103,303                                                                  


                  disclosed or suggested by Example 3 as written.                                     
                  Unless a person skilled in the art set out with a                                   
                  preconceived agenda--to seize upon whatever                                         
                  procedure was necessary to obtain a copolymer                                       
                  falling within the Galimberti patent claims--that                                   
                  person would never repeat Asanuma application                                       
                  Example 3 in the particular manner and technique                                    
                  that Dr. Asanuma testified was adopted.  There is                                   
                  nothing in the example that describes that                                          






























                                                -24-                                                  




Page:  Previous  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007